Tuesday, 4 October 2016

Big Ups to Big Bob (Bradley)

For being the first US coach in the Premiership. Wishing him much success-- and hoping that he NEVER uses the word "soccer" in association with the beautiful sport.

http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/37551059

The only time I'll root against him is when the Swans face the Red & Blue of SE25!

VP Debate: Pence v. Kaine

Hello beloved readers. It's been quite a while, but I have a quick one here as I watch the VP Debate:
  • Kaine interrupting WAY too much
  • Both guys talking over one another a bit too much, but mostly due to bullet #1; and finally
  • Agree with his positions or not, why isn't PENCE the Presidential candidate?!? He's head and shoulders (and torso and legs) above the his Presidential-candidate running mate-- i.e. he can calmly and measuredly string together a sentence composed of more than 3 words-- none of which are superlatives-- without mentioning Rosie O'Donnell or going down a rabbit hole

Tuesday, 5 May 2015

Big Trucks: If Only I Could Create the Venn Diagram

So, after extensive research I've come to the conclusion that:

All drivers of BIG Trucks ≠ Rednecks

The Proof: I saw a BIG truck on Mopac with a Ultimate Frisbee sticker on it!? Wot?! 

Or perhaps it simply leads to an alternative theorem:

All Ultimate players ≠ Hippies

The Proof: I saw a BIG truck on Mopac with an Ultimate sticker on it, remember?

Conclusion: either there's a subset of the hippie population that does drive BIG trucks, OR there are some BIG truck drivers/lovers who are actually hippies on the DL . . . .


OK, So This Guy's Officially an Idiot

Need I say more?

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-32601830

We love our Troops. Welcome our Troops home. These colors don't run--- blah, blah, blah

But we actually don't REEEEALLY trust them after all?! wot?

Thursday, 23 April 2015

I Just Don't Get It (a REALLY old post I didn't publish but will share for your enjoyment)

I know someone who used to say (and, now based on pretty concrete evidence has put her money where her mouth is), that she could only date guys of one certain race because they were the only types she was attracted to . . . . hmmh

I'll write more later, but come on, REALLY?

Yes, many people have a "type". But there are always some seriously good-looking people who fall outside of that type.

And the most ironic thing is that this person stuck to her guns, getting one of her "types"; but if that's the sacrifice you have to make to stay true to your self-- then maybe one's type/taste just isn't so good. OK, looks, sans trabajo ≠ good looking, even IF you actually are . . . .

At Least He Said, "I'm Sorry" (for accidentally shooting you)

Another week (last), another brutha shot by a policeman.

Those who think this is ok will say, well he shouldn't have been trying to sell a gun to an undercover officer. But similar to the Walter Scott scenario-- you MAY remember his being killed ummmm . . . . . last week-- a busted tail light, or selling a gun (not pointing it, etc), walking around in a hoodie (oh wait, that killer wasn't even a cop-- THANKS Florida!) are not crimes that should to a death sentence. I mean maybe in N. Korea or in ISIS controlled territory. But I wasn't aware that we'd altered the US Constitution to revoke the right to a trial by jury in lieu of summary execution?! I think I missed that Amendment.

So I mentioned in the past few days-- running from the cops probably isn't the best idea. In most people's minds that equates to he/she's guilty, otherwise they wouldn't run away from me. And while most humans would probably think similarly, the simple conclusion is that someone running AWAY FROM you poses little threat to your personal safety. Maybe they're running off into the woods because they're a Prepper (is that correct?) and they just happen to have a stash of guns, grenades, bombs, anthrax, maybe an F-16 in the woods RIGHT by where they were pulled over (Oh wait, that's the honkys (ha-ha) who do that sh**. Bruthas are too lazy to be diggin' some big hole to put all their gold chains and guns in-- just in case the end-of-the-world were to begin.)

But on a serious note-- and this would take another entire entry or two or five-- guess what: There are larger, engrained dynamics at play around why more bruthas (per capita) have runs-ins with the law. Similar to the economic dynamics laid out in my oft-read and cited piece on immigration (and how THOSE people are ruining our country, btw), there are similar historical and cultural forces at play here.

Ask yourself, why would somebody want to go out and make maybe what, $400/week ($20,800, gross/year), at a fast-food joint when you could, what, double that with a little more risk-- i.e. engaging in slightly "more risky" work (or in the other case, crossing the border-- though the multiplier there is closer to 10x).

I wonder if I should just change the name of your beloved "Stuff" to "Shootin' Bruthas"?

Sunday, 12 April 2015

The NEEEEEW Style

4 and 3 and 2 and 1-- what up-- and when I'm on the mic the sucka's run . . .  just like Walter Scott tried to do

The latest officer-"involved" shooting in Charleston raises questions about whether a fashion change might actually help save lives.

Of course, we start with the assumption that running from the cops isn't the best idea; that could of course be coupled with another heuristic that shooting someone in the back-- who is retreating or running AWAY from you-- constitutes murder.

But what if we gave up the saggin' pants (and also suits and other normal clothes) and started wearing kevlar vests with helments-- maybe a little lower abdomen body armor to protect the intestines and nads. While it might not LOOK so cool or tough, such "fashion" could have stopped most, it not all of the bullets the struck Walter Scott.

I mean how coo . . . ., errr, protected-lookin' is this guy?! (still needs the groin accessory)
Image result for kevlar vest

You can even get one for your pet!





There cold be an entire cottage industry just waiting to spring up. You could probably even weave kevlar into some trousers (shout out to my UK peeps!). If you could get some of those bruthas I see with pants just about to fall down to pull them up,  my kevlar Sean Johns could totally look hella cool and also save lives.

Of course, it would set you back a cool $300- $500 for such a survival, I mean, STYLE investment! Luckily, black goes with everything!



Friday, 10 April 2015

R.I.P. Tweety


Naming her Sylvester would have been a perversion because my cat—no, not the one in the video below (testing, testing)—just killed a real Tweety bird. Unlike the well-known London parakeets or the famous San Francisco parrots, I haven’t seen any tropical-looking birds in my brief time here, so I fear it may have been a pet that escaped. The poor creature obviously did not know not to land anywhere in Boom-Boom’s range—I don’t even know that trees are safe! Lizards, the occasional frog and one snake have so far been her quarry. But after one bird earlier this week + this bright, beautiful little avian, I think it may be time to invest in a bell—I’ll tell Boom Boom that her momma made me do it!


I'm Back . . . Again!

I hope none of you have been holding your breath for the entire time, but I'm back on the airwaves! I've even already posted something for your thought and enjoyment.
And there's more to come.
It's exciting, isn't it-- not that I'm back, just that the world's so eff'd up that there's no shortage of things to write . . .  I mean, BLOG, about.

If I Could Only Get Over There In Front Of You, I’d Say FREEZE (then you’d also know that I have my gun aimed at you)

-->
So the latest police killing of an unarmed (black) person—this time for a non-functioning tail light—spurred the usual conversation about how utterly ridiculous, not to mention illegal, it is. One aspect of the conversation was the victim’s profile—50 yrs old, dressed normally, BLACK, etc. A side mention was made about how could someone with a gun, who’d just used a taser be worried about someone like that—i.e. it’s not like the victim looked “thuggish” (which still doesn’t wipe away one’s civil rights and liberties—on paper at least).

Then I got to thinking about my personal appearance. My wife will tell you I’m not the fanciest dressed; it’s more like people might toss me spare change if only I had a receptacle held out. But there have been a copule of times where I dressed like a straight up gangsta— loc's ("lokes") (at night), saggin’ pants, lid, and the stroll. The only thing I was missing were the Crip slips and corn rows.

It was Halloween-- actually 2 in a row due to my lack of creativity. Both instances were a) as a Stanford student, b) on Stanford’s campus,  c) at Stanford parties, where d) I didn’t encounter any (university) policepersons. I wonder if the situation would have been any different had I been walking through Palo Alto  (dressed like that) minding my business on a different night, or even on Halloween for that matter.

Fast forward10 years to New Orleans—where I actually had a gun pulled on me by police—where I was working as a Associate attorney at one of the city’s (more formerly than current) hoity-toity law firms. How it happened is a long and sad story of ignorance of the 3 cops who entered my house with a gun drawn. But the question is, in suit pants and a t-shirt (in my own house)—the oppressive NOLA climate compelled me to strip off the top, dress-shirt and tie layer as soon as I got inside—did I look THAT much more threatening than when dressed as a gangsta? Luckily, I didn't happen to walk out of the kitchen to greet said cops while holding a knife-- small or large-- I'd just used to cut a sandwich. Otherwise, I guarantee you I wouldn't be here to write this!

As I (luckily) didn’t encounter any police officers on those Halloweens, I don’t have any incident to compare to my NOLA run in. But suffice it to say that if I looked like a possible thief in my partial suit, who knows what the translation/reaction in their minds would have been were I dressed like a thug? I guess I’m just fortunate it wasn’t in my Stanford Halloween costume when those who serve and protect us busted into my house to serve and protect me from . . . . .myself?? 


Thursday, 23 August 2012

More Persecuted Than Thou

Guy #1- Man, I'd take the holocaust over slavery any day. At least you got it over with quick if they made you take a shower!

Guy #2- Hell no, bruv, being a (US) slave was just kinda like camping. And at least you mostly got to live through your entire life.

OK, so maybe it's a stretch, but you get the picture-- what you suffered through is always worse than what everyone else has experienced. It's as if every group wants the prize for having suffered the greatest injustice.

Shall we continue . . . .

Person #3- those gay people can hide their gay-ness, so why are they complaining about inequality. I'll take being gay over (choose an ethnicity) ________ any day! I can't hide my ______-ness!

So I've gotta admit that this is one that I've mostly heard from "African Americans" as to why the concerns of one minority group are not as legitimate as those of another. Huh?! First of all, there's no history of gay oppression (like Slavery). I mean gay people only appeared on the scene afte the whole civil rights struggle, right. They shouldn't be trying to piggyback and share the spoils of what WE fought for. How dare they compare their struggle to ours. I mean there were laws banning who WE could marry; We were discriminated against in the workplace. People even turned a blind eye to someone dragging us off and killing us strictly due to our color. And we didn't CHOOSE to be black! They've never had to endure such civil rights violations stemmiing from the lifestyle they choose-- they all just live happily in San Francisco and run around with those rainbow flags! So like I said, I'll take gay ofer black anytime. They've got it easy!

There are other examples of groups focusing just on those issues that impact them/not understanding  others' plights:
  • Trayvon-- given that no one should be stalked and murdered for walking down the street, black folks are (understandibly) SO up in arms on this. But shouldn't "those people" be just as angry when a black person shoots another person from Africa? Or when an african american, or hispanic/latino, or asian, or white purposefully kills someone, regardless of race. I didn't see anyone out marching over the Sikh temple killings! If we have the energy to march and protest for "one of ours," we're just beign complacent when we don't expend such energy fighting for others. Because guess what, if we correct it on one front, the benefit will likely extend to more than those directly involved-- it's called PRECEDENT
  • (Perhaps far-fetched, but) a "radical" gay person-- the other minority groups have all of these protections (marriage, employment, housing, etc.). What about us? I'll take being a Vietnamese immigrant any day over being gay. They've got it so much easier
  • And those illegal immigrants-- they just come waltzing over the border and use our schools, social services, etc. Coming to the US must just be like some kind of damn holiday for them!
How about we all fight to educate and correct all injustice, including that which we suffer(ed)? As long as we're all waging our separate campaigns, that just keeps us focused on our own little worlds. Injustice anywhere should be addressed, especially by anyone whose group may (or has in the past) be susceptible to an erosion of rights. Let's see, that would be all . . . . women, muslims (well, we've got to have someone to demonize), immigrants, jews, latinos, gays, blacks, etc. Imagine if all these pendejos got on the same page!? But I bet you'll still have women who vote for Akin (I mean those Democrats' values are just all whacky), and black folks who are weary of muslims (guess how many black  muslims there are; now how do you choose?) and poor latinos fighting against poor blacks (I guess that keeps both of those groups preoccupied and not paying any attention to how they BOTH being pissed on!)

The more people who are aware of whatever the injustice, the better. It's just more easy and convenient to focus on our own. Many groups may have legitimate gripes. The one we should all be on board and fighting for is the Native Americans. We victims of whatever past transgression we suffered are all here squatting on their land, granted some of us not by our own choosing. Sarcasm aside, the Native Americans pretty much have us all beat and should qualify as the most persecuted (than thou).

"Fast Shoes"

Is it the shoes?!?

A while back, my then-3-year old (who at the time mostly wore Crocs) got a new pair of sandals. The difference was that the new sandals velcroed across the top. Of course, when he ran with his new, more technologically-advanced footwear, the shoes didn't come flop around or come flying off. This radical development enabled him to run much faster than before. When we were going out the next day, boy requested his "Fast Shoes."

Move over Track shoe! (I wonder if he also jumped higher in the Fast shoes?) I'm off to the Trademark Office just in case.


Legitimate Rape?!

Ummmmmmmmm, I guess that's kinda like . . . .
  • Gentle Genocide: you know, before they actually killed the females, they were LEGITIMATELY raped-- so, where's the issue?
  • A Happy Holocaust: well, we were having some overpopulation issues, so we thought this might be a good way to help the earth. We just picked those who (fill in blank and choose as many as apply) look like ________/ come from _______/ believe in _______-- you  know, those who are responsible for (fill in a societal problem that this group did not cause) __________, and viola, we've reduced our nation's carbon footprint!
  • Kinder, Gentler Slavery: I mean, we let them eat the pig entrails after we were done with the parts a human might actually WANT to eat. Oh, and the reason we sold their children to another "manager" was so that the little ones could gain valuable work experience at an early age, without being distracted by their parents. BTW, that's the same reason we'd punish them if we foound them reading-- simply instilling that good ole' work ethic. We just want to maximize their chances of succeeding in life (as the next generation of slaves). And if you're reading, how on earth are you going to labor at the same time?!
  • A Perfectly Understandable Honour Killing (Notice the spelling for my peeps in the UK, b/c this is one where the US actually has one on you.): Sh*#! I mean who would want their daughter to be free to decide how to live her life, or be "Western," leading her to do things like walk alongside a male, or drive, or  . . . . breathe?!
This all begs the question as to what constitutes an Illigitimate Rape??

Fine print- this list not necessarily ranked in order of severity. Translation-- for those who subscribe to the More Persecuted than Thou mindset (don't worry loyal readers, I'll post this one soon and even link it for you), don't get your panties in a wad. Oh wait, the first three are, mas o menos, the same thing; but don't tell that to the various sufferers or their descendants. We need at least one thing to continually disagree over, right?

Friday, 3 August 2012

Winners Don't Do Drugs

Let me get this right . . . . .
Either Michael Phelps is a LOSER, . . . . 
Weed isn't a drug, . . . . orrrrrrr
We all need to hit the bong every now and then in order to activate our inner-overachiever.

Lochte's Grill!

Either Ryan Lochte's ghetto, or Grills aren't! At least Lochte's was a custom job (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2182126/Ryan-Lochtes-Olympic-grill-designed-rapper-Paul-Wall.html?ito=feeds-newsxml). And I didn't know swimmers were PAID like Lochte-- $25,000 per grill?!-- and he's got, like, 4!! Look out sport of swimming, once those little (real) ghetto kids realize you can both a) get paid, and that b) grills are part of the swimming culture, guess who's sgonna dominate that sport!?

Go on Ryan!

Sunday, 8 July 2012

Commercialism in . . . Football, Sports, Everything?

Just coming off my SUN morning ritual of watching the SAT, MLS highlights . . . . During the RSL vs. whoever match, there was a cornerkick-- oops!, I mean a "KFC Colonel's Corner Kick"-- whether or  not RSL scored is immaterial here.

Is it just me, or does the "KFCC CK" seem absurd to anyone else? I'm all for a little marketing, especially when it's clever and funny, but a KFC corner kick?! I guess we Americans lead the way with such "innovative" methods, as I have yet to see a "Carlsburg" or "Vodaphone" penalty kick on ITV. Of course, we're spared with the BBC, as it's commercial free; but that's the other exterme. I mean, give me one or two good Superbowl-type commercials. (There are also some very good British ads.) But don't simply overrun my threshold sense of commercialism with marketing every little element of a sporting event.

Looking at the bright side, at least the MLS/KFC contract didn't dictate that it be called the "Kentucky Fried Chicken, Colonel Harlan Sanders, resumption of play after the defending team last touched the ball before it went into touch over said team's endline." That would be a proper way to even further innundate the advertising-starved audience norteamericano.

I guess such marketing has been going on for a while now. I remember such games as the Cotton Bowl, or the [fill in the traditional name] Bowl, initially being relabeled the [fill in corporate sponsor/product] [fill in traditional name] Bowl. Eventually the traditional name was dropped from many of these games, leaving just the [fill in corporate sponsor/product] [delete the traditional name] Bowl format, yielding such interesting tilts as "The Outback Bowl" (not played in Australia, btw), or the Beef "O" Brady's Bowl (is that a menu item, or a sports contest?) or the GODADDY.com Bowl-- wtf?! So it should be no surprise that we've descended even further into pure commercialism with the likes of the KFC Corner Kick or Doritos Halftime.

The million dollar question for KFC or PepsiCo/Frito-Lay's marketing team is how much a, say, $5M sponsorship (and what some may consider over-the-top "relabeling"-- or using a common-noun modifier-- of "Halftime") generates in a) new Doritos sales, and b) repeat purchases, by people who otherwise may not have done so?  Does seeing Michelin Halftime make everyone run out to the nearest Pep Boyz (I hear they're changing the spelling to match kids' perceptions) to get new tires pur on the SUV? There  must be something to it, otherwise the companies wouldn't spend the money they do on such subtle advertising.

The other question is where does it all stop? Or does it? Just imagine the possibilities for enhancing the  Ibrahimovic's goal versus les Bleus with a football fan's desire for a bucket-- the KFC Biscuit (scone for those readers in the UK) is played wide toward the right, KFC Cole Slaw corner flag into the path of KFC Corn on the Cob #7, Sebastian Larsson. Buttery Corn Cob plays teh Biscuit with a brilliant first time, KFC Original Recipe cross back toward the top, center of the KFC Chicken Nugget 18-yard box, where KFC Extra Crispy, #10, Zlatan Ibrahimovic meets the Biscuit with perfectly timed run, adjusting midstride for a beautiful KFC Hot Wings (bone in), side volley into KFC Mashed Potatoes, #1 Lloris' KFC Bucket goal! How could any sports purist not appreciate prose so descriptive that it almost puts you into Row 15 at the final KFC Macaroni & Cheese, Group D match at KFC Euro 2012 in Kyiv's Colonel Sanders Olympic-Stadium?!

Sunday, 3 June 2012

US Football-- not tough enough??

RE: Klinsy's call for the US team to be nastier

There's been some talk of coach Jurgen Klinsmann's call for the US team to be "nastier" or play with a littler more bite somtimes. Here's my take . . . .

Remember Jeremies tackle on Reyna right out the gate in WC 1998 (in what I believe must have been one of Klinsmann's only matches vs. the US). I recall it being over the top, but it completely neutralized Reyna, our best and key player, for the rest of the match. With the skill gap, I'm not sure that GER needed to rough us up back then, but it was probably standard practice-- at least in any major competition-- to get into the opponnents' heads. As Cap of that squad JK carries all of that knowledge and experience. Not much changed in our following, 2002 WC. Although we had an incredible tournament and should have beat Germany, we still weren't physical, even in response to physicality-- e.g. Marquez's blatant elbow to C. Jones' head. Someone should have (cleanly) put a crunching tackle in on Marquez-- or any of the other 9 MEX outfield players-- after that, a la J. Jones. In addition to an overall, higher US skill-level compared to the '98 squad, it was ironically, the swagger-- i.e. the "mental" lack of respect (awe or over-respect, that is) for our opponents-- displayed by the likes of the 21'ish LD and DMB that helped take us so deep in '02. However, physicality is a different facet of respect. I think LD's "US DNA" comment is actually pretty fair- i.e. fairness and toughness (but on the receiving end-- e.g. no diving/acting) are somewhat US-cultural. But physicality (on the giving end) is an aspect of the game we need take on/develop. It's no different than any other contact sport-- you've got to be able to "bring it" at the appropriate time and in the appropriate manner.

Saturday, 23 October 2010

How People Categorize Themselves

This is one I've been intending to explore for quite some time now- the draft was dated 28 FEB 2008!

It's not a new topic or anything. And I've been told about at least one study on the topic. Of course, I will od my best to bring a fresh, new perspective to the table.

The questions is: how do you subconsciously "label" or tag yourself? The follow-up questions are a) how you rank those characteristics, and b) whether you arrived at the characteristics and rankings based upon how others see you or how you see yourself (or some of both??). Another interesting question is whether you change your rankings depending on who you're speaking to.

For example, would Sarah (sp?) Palin use any of the following adjectives to describe herself: former AK Governor, hockey mom, Idaho-ian(?), woman, former US VP candidate, married, white, maverick(y), Republican, Alaskan, Tea Party-ier, bulldog with lipstick (her own words), conservative, fashionable, (norte) American, etc.

Assuming most of these are legit adjectives Ms. Palin would use to describe herself, question #1 is how she'd order those in importance. My point is that a person who sees themselves as Conservative, Republican, Tea-partier, American, former AK Governor, white, mom, woman, etc. would have a different belief set than if the ranking were woman, mom, N. American, former AK Gov, conservative, T-Partier (no, that's not a French word), etc. However, this is the same person. How do we arrive at our labels, but more importantly, our self-rankings?

Get my point? We'll have to come back and revist this one, as it could get lengthy.

Next up, Michelle Obama.

hasta pronto

2009 in Review, pt. 2- Charles

The biggest event for me in 2009- yes, that's almost a year away now- actually happened in early 2009. My worst and lifetime-lasting memory of that year will be the death of my dear friend Charles. This should have gone at the top of my list, and I'll leave it at that.

And as promised almost a year ago, my first pix on your favorie blog (o.k., so it's really only a link to fotos . . . .)

R.I.P. Charles. We miss you.

Friday, 29 January 2010

2009 in Review (before 2011 begins)

I'm back, and I apologize to all around the world who have been waiting very patiently for a new post for the past oh . . . . . year or so now. I thought I'd try to make more of a habit of posting (choose and adjective) interesting/controversial/informative/funny/none of the above perspectives on various topice of importance. With this first, return-to-action post I thought I'd pitch a softball, a nice easy review of some 2009 events. These are in no particular order of importance, and there's no way I can promise chronological rank because I can barely remember what I did last week. The following are just a few of the things that stuck out in my mind from last year:

A) America Day at Madame Toussaud's (sp?) in London: on 20 JAN 2009, the famous wax museum let everyone with an American passport in for free in honor of Barak Obama's inauguration! You know I couldn't pass THAT up- the free bit, that is. That day, not only did we get to go on a "date" to the wax museum (and romantic it was), but we also got to see BO sworn into office, bringing that intangible hope to many Americans. OK, so maybe it was only about 55% of Americans, but that's way more than in either of the Bush elections. And it was very reassuring to see W and Laura ride off in Marine whatever the number changes to when you're no longer the Prez. Of course Cheney is still lurking around in his lair, probably plotting the first US coup.

BO's first year has been not quite what many had predicted. I am hoping that is more a symptom of the challenges of getting anything logical done in DC than his shifting from an evil socialist who wants to make society more egalatarian to el presidente behind the latest Afghanistan surge and the still-opened Guantanamo "detention" center. He also stepped in it on the Honduras thing, you know that little triangular-shaped pais in C. America.

B) My first full club match in London: yes, finally, just under 2 years after arriving in London, I played in my first proper, 11-a-side match with my team from Lewisham. The most striking thing about this match- one of MANY Sunday football matches through London- to probably any Norte Americano is that at first glance they may have thought is was an NBA match, except for the large grass field and 22 people running around. Or perhaps it was an NFL practice (with 2 black QB's- remember when that was a big deal?!) without pads and with all of the players kicking the (round) ball?!

It was neither of these, but the main aspect my US-trained mind picked up on was that it was ALL bruthas, the Jamaicans vs. the Africans. And boy did the the Africans play nice football- we eventually lost about 4-1 or so. Anyway, I just find it so funny when some "African Americans" I encounter- mostly the blacker-than-thou types- always want to bash football and so myopically think it's soft or boring, etc. It's always easier to disregard something about which you have no knolwledge or exposure. The sad part is when you stop your investigation and analysis there.

Well guess what all of you proud-to-be-black people in the US-- pretty much all other black folks around the world play the beautiful game, and most play it quite well- see the Africa Cup of Nations. I'd imagine if some of the heroes of your more narrow world- e.g. Kobe, Reggie B, Neon Deion, Barry Sanders, etc.- played proper football from a young age, not only would you be singing a different tune, but I'd bet money that the US would have won a World Cup by now. Oh, that's the tournament that actually produces a TRUE world champion.

And don't get me wrong, it's not just black folks who don't understand the complexities of football. US whities are just as guilty and see it as a foreign, non-macho endeavor. However, at home, the sport has always been viewed as more of a white sport, though the reality of that looks to be shifting. I'm also simply more critical of my own peeps, who many times are very satisfied, or even feel they MUST be followers of all things "black," whatever that is. Oh, right, those are the expectations and stereotypes we and others place on ourselves, that we buy in to and thereby limit what we allow ourselves to achieve and be exposed to- i.e. to learn.

C) X-mas Play at School: suffice it to say there ain't no separation of church and state here. The kids respective X-mas productions are straight up what you have to go to church to get at home. They sing about baby jesus and dress up as wise men and shepherds, joseph and mary, and basically act it out in front of the full-on manger backdrop.

That's one of the cool things about England. They don't worry about offending anyone. Of course, they're not setting out to offend anyone. They just haven't folded to the whole, stupid PC mindset, where how you phrase something is more imoprtant than what you actually do! i.e. the general part of London that we live in is very integrated, and you don't get all of these people who are either over snesitive about race, which causes others to worry about how or whoat thay say. Most here would describe me as "American" before they'd describe me as "black," or god forbid, "African American." As a result, here they still say "Happy Christmas" (of course, they screwed up the Merry part, but they really do need to work on some aspects of their English here) and act out birth-of-JC scenes in the public schools . . . and nobody really seems to care. It may be a little insensitive, I don' tknow. But that's how they've done it here. And more importantly, people's actions (like their travels, the friends they keep, etc.) speak louder than hollow, conformist words.

It all really hit home with the little muslim girl, head scarf and all, was right up on the risers with the rest of the rainbow coalition of kids singing about Christmas and jesus. Could you imagine such a scene at home? Whoat!?

D) Death of MJ (no, not Peter Parker's dreamboat): this is primarily a mention for my girl, Meena. Of course, I am quite a big fan of "Off the Wall" and consider it one of the best albums ever. RIP Michael.

E) Lagos, Nigeria: this place takes the cake for 3rd (oops, I mean "Developing") World- meets crazy oil money- meets one of the most densely populated cities on the African continent. I don't even know where to start.

I've put in some time in the developing world- from my regular hitch hikes in Honduras to an almost toppling bus in Nepal to tromping around bits of Guatemala and India. But the bustle, traffic, pop. density and the street entrepeneurs who put the Crenshaw and Slauson bruthas to shame were over the top. On one strecth of major boulevard coming back into Victoria Island, the stop-and-go traffic creates an almost bazaar-like atmosphere . . . down the MIDDLE of the road!? No, not on the median, I'm talking between the lanes. You can buy everything from socks, to music, to food, to clothes, to kitchen utensils, to floor mats for your car. It's like a drive through where you don't drive up to the window, but the windows walk up to you.

Needless to say, the whole atmosphere was a bit of sensory overload. For the first time in my life, I really had no desire to leave the big hotel's gated,walled compound and go explore my surrondings. Of course, it must be Lagos. I mean, it couldn't be me just getting S-O-F-T in my old age . . . . .


And that pretty sums up all of 2009- pretty efficient, eh? Note that there are definitely exceptions to those issues I discuss above. However, you can pretty much take what I say as the most enlighttened perspective. Now you can also look forward to hearing from me more frequently in 2010.